Starchak Law Firm (also referred to as Starchak Immigration Law Firm, PLLC) is a Colorado immigration practice affiliated with attorney Ilona Starchak. The available materials include the official website, historical data on the declared services and languages, as well as several reviews on third-party sites. The official website was unavailable at the time of collection (HTTP 403), so current services, pricing, and license status have not been independently verified.
Reviews of Starchak Law Firm: how to read profile materials
The Starchak Law Firm profile contains available materials about clients’ experiences and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.
The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.
Consider the date and boundaries of the sample. Old observations do not guarantee that the site's rating is the same today.
Facts and data boundaries
Company overview
Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
Russian, Ukrainian, English
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026. Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates
Declared service areas
family immigration
shelter and protection
labor and business immigration issues
citizenship
defense in deportation cases
students and visitors
A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.
Specialization and suitable clients
According to historical data on the official website, the practice is positioned as immigration representation in the United States with the direct attention of an attorney. The list of declared areas includes family immigration, asylum and protection, labor and business issues, citizenship, defense in deportation cases, as well as categories of students and visitors.
This combination of areas may be relevant to people who need help with family petitions, refugee/asylum status, work visas or naturalization, as well as those facing removal proceedings. However, this is just a list from a historical snapshot; The relevance and completeness of the services as of the current date could not be confirmed, since the official website returned an access error when collecting.
It is also worth considering that the available materials do not contain confirmed information about prices, terms and success rates. It is reasonable to clarify these questions directly during the consultation.
Declared areas: family immigration, asylum and protection, work and business, citizenship, removal defense, students and visitors.
Positioning: immigration representation in the USA with the direct participation of a lawyer (based on a historical photo of the site).
The relevance of the list of services has not been confirmed: the official website was unavailable at the time of collection.
Is the firm suitable for deportation cases?
In the historical snapshot of the site, removal defense is listed among the directions. This does not confirm that the firm will take a particular case; check during consultation.
Does the company work with work visas?
The historical list of services covers labor and business issues. Relevance and details are not confirmed due to the unavailability of the site.
The only official source of available materials—the website starchaklawfirm.com—was unavailable during collection (status 403, text “Just a moment...”). Therefore, only the information that is recorded in the historical snapshot can be considered confirmed: the list of directions and languages of service.
Geography is not directly described in the sources studied. Indirect signs point to Colorado: the sources mention Denver, Aurora and Greenwood Village, as well as the address code 80111. This does not confirm that the company accepts clients only from Colorado or that it has offices at these addresses.
Reviews on third-party sites describe work with clients on immigration issues, but do not contain a confirmed geography of service.
The official website is unavailable during collection (403), so the current list of services is not confirmed.
The historical snapshot lists six areas of practice.
Indirect geographical indicators: Colorado (Denver, Aurora, Greenwood Village, zip code 80111).
There is no direct confirmation of the geography of service in the studied sources.
Can I apply from another state?
The sources studied do not contain confirmed information about the geography of service. This question should be asked to the company directly.
Does the firm have an office in Denver?
There are references to Denver and other Colorado cities in the sources, but there is no confirmed office address in the sources studied.
The historical snapshot of the site indicates service in English, Russian and Ukrainian. This is a company statement captured in the image and not an independently verified fact.
Indirectly, Russian-language communication is confirmed by reviews: one of them is written in Ukrainian (brief thanks), others in English. There are no Russian-language reviews in the selected sample, so the Russian language relies primarily on the site’s statement.
For practical purposes, this means that a Russian-speaking client will likely have access to communication in their native language, but the specific format (translation of documents, assistance in interviews) should be clarified.
Declared languages according to the historical photo of the site: English, Russian, Ukrainian.
One review in the sample is written in Ukrainian, the rest are in English.
There are no Russian-language reviews in the selected sample.
Is reception conducted in Russian?
According to the historical image of the site, Russian and Ukrainian languages are declared. This is the company's statement; There is no independent confirmation in the available materials.
Do they help with document translation?
There is no information about translation services in the available materials. Check during consultation.
From the reviews it is clear that clients describe consultations, preparation of a package of documents and support at interviews. One author notes that the documents were prepared in a short time and that a representative was present at the interview. Another client mentions support in two stages: obtaining a green card and removing the conditions of residence.
This is a description of the experiences of specific clients, not a description of the firm's formal process. In the sources studied, there is no confirmed information about how exactly the work is structured: stages, deadlines, who is leading the case, how communication is organized.
Questions that are wise to ask before starting work include: who will be the lead attorney on the case; how often communication occurs; what documents are needed at the start; what is included in the price and what is paid separately; how documents are transferred and how confidentiality is ensured.
The reviews mention consultations, preparation of documents and support during interviews.
One review describes the work in two stages: green card and removal of conditions.
There is no official description of the process in the available materials.
Does a lawyer accompany you to the interview?
One reviewer reports that a representative was with him for an interview. This is an isolated review and not a confirmed practice of the company.
Who will handle my business?
There is no confirmed information about the distribution of cases in the available materials. Check during consultation.
The sources studied do not contain confirmed information about prices, tariffs, payment procedures or terms of the contract. Neither the official website (inaccessible) nor the reviews contain specific numbers.
This is not a shortcoming of the company: the lack of data in the studied sources only means that the cost needs to be clarified directly. When contacting, it makes sense to request a written agreement with a list of services, stages and payment terms.
Questions for clarification: is the cost fixed or hourly; what is included in the fee; Are government fees paid separately? Is it possible to pay in stages? What are the terms of termination?
There are no confirmed prices and contract terms in the sources studied.
A lack of data does not mean a lack of transparency—it is a limitation of sources.
It is wise to request a written agreement outlining the services and payment terms.
How much does a consultation cost?
There is no confirmed information about the cost in the sources studied. Check with the company directly.
Is there a fixed price for the case?
There is no data on the pricing model in the sources studied.
The sources studied included six reviews: five from the Birdeye site and one from localitybiz.com. All are marked as historical imports without independent re-verification. Identification and deduplication are inherited from the dashboard rather than independently validated.
Historical Birdeye rating observations: 4.8 out of 5 with 68 reviews (snapshot 2026-10-07) and 4.8 out of 5 with 69 reviews (snapshot 2026-10-07). These are historical snapshots and not current rankings; fee coverage may have been incomplete.
The selected sample, with exceptions, does not constitute a comprehensive independent ranking. Reviews on other sites, including Avvo, Martindale, Trustpilot and others, are present as URLs in the sources studied, but their content is not disclosed.
Review publication dates are relative (for example, “2 months ago”), exact dates are not available. This limits the ability to link reviews to a specific period.
Six reviews in the sample: five from Birdeye, one from localitybiz.com.
All reviews are historical imports without independent re-verification.
Birdeye Historical Images: 4.8/5 with 68 and 69 reviews (2026-10-07).
The sample is not a comprehensive independent ranking.
There are no exact publication dates for reviews.
Can a 4.8 rating be considered current?
No. This is a historical Birdeye image from 2026-10-07; current rating may vary.
Why are there only six reviews in the sample?
This is a selected sample with exceptions; it does not exhaust all reviews about the company.
Several themes were repeated in the selected reviews: attentiveness and care, clear explanation of steps, efficiency in preparing documents and support during interviews. One author notes that a process that seemed stressful became manageable and organized.
This does not mean that complaints do not exist: the sample is limited, and other sites (Avvo, Martindale, Trustpilot, etc.) in the sources studied only provide URLs without disclosed content. The absence of complaints in the sample is a limitation of the data, not confirmation of their absence.
If the company has public responses to reviews, they are not recorded in the sources studied.
Attentiveness and care is a recurring theme in the reviews.
Other sites in the studied sources are not disclosed in terms of content.
Prompt preparation of documents (one review at a time).
Accompaniment to interviews (one review per review).
Long-term cooperation across several stages (one review at a time).
What do clients praise most often?
The selected reviews most often mentioned attentiveness, clarity of explanations and support. These are topics from several reviews, not statistics.
Is there any feedback on the results of the cases?
In the sources studied, there are no recorded company responses to reviews.
Before concluding an agreement, it makes sense to independently check several things that are not confirmed in the sources studied: a valid lawyer’s license in the state registry, a current list of services on the official website, as well as current contacts and address.
This does not mean that complaints do not exist: the sample is limited, and other sites (Avvo, Martindale, Trustpilot, etc.) only have URLs without disclosed content in the available materials. The absence of complaints in the sample is a limitation of the data, not confirmation of their absence.
If the company has public responses to reviews, they are not recorded in the available materials.
There are no complaints in the sample of six reviews.
Other sites in the available materials are not disclosed in content.
The absence of complaints in the sample does not equal their absence as a whole.
Are there any negative reviews?
Through the official registry of the bar of the relevant state. In the sources studied, such a check was not performed.
Does the company respond to reviews?
There are no recorded company responses to reviews in the available materials.
Extraordinary ability and NIWBusiness and employmentAsylum and defense
Ace Immigration is the immigration practice of Russian-speaking lawyer Anna Tsibel with offices in Westlake Village (California) and Boca Raton (Florida). According to the official website, the company claims to work in all 50 states, conduct business in Russian...
4.90/ 5
142 ratings on platforms Platform average weighted by rating count
Consumer Law Group (also referred to as "Los Guardianes Del Pueblo") is a law firm headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, with additional offices in Berwyn, Illinois, and Boca Raton, Florida. According to the official...
4.72/ 5
291 ratings on platforms Platform average weighted by rating count
Extraordinary ability and NIWBusiness and employmentAsylum and defense
An international law firm with offices in the USA, Great Britain, Italy and a number of other countries, specializing in immigration and corporate issues: EB-5 and E-2 investment visas, L-1 intra-corporate transfers, and so on...
4.64/ 5
75 ratings on platforms Platform average weighted by rating count
