✦immigration-reviews.ru
Company profile

Irina Lust Law PLLC reviews

The immigration law firm Irina Lust Law PLLC (office in Westport, Connecticut), according to the official website, specializes exclusively in immigration law and claims to work with Russian-speaking clients. Below is a dossier collected only from the materials of the package: the official pages of the site and a selected sample of reviews from external sites. This is not a comprehensive independent rating.

Citizenship
Official website ↗

Reviews about Irina Lust Law PLLC: how to read profile materials

The Irina Lust Law PLLC profile contains available materials about client experience and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.

Reviews and ratings · Sources · Methodology · JSON profile data

Platform ratings

The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.

Site and typePointsQuantityDate of observation
dosfinds.usHistorical site card4.7 / 5.0Unknown
google.comHistorical site card4.5 / 5.0Unknown
Google via Birdeye (mirror)Published card, indexed snapshotIncluded in the rating4.5 / 5118Date unknown

Consider the date and boundaries of the sample. Old observations do not guarantee that the site's rating is the same today.

Facts and data boundaries

Company overview

Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
Russian, English
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026.
Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates

Declared service areas

  • Tourist visas (B1/B2)
  • Immigration through work
  • Appeals
  • Family immigration
  • Immigration by Investment
  • Forgives (waivers) of crimes and frauds
  • Obtaining US Citizenship

A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.

Specialization and suitable clients

According to the official website, the firm Irina Lust Law PLLC states that it specializes exclusively in immigration law, and that immigration lawyer Irina Lust, for more than 18 years of practice, has helped 1000+ immigrants from Russian-speaking countries and from all over the world move, legalize and build a future in the United States (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

The “Our Philosophy” section on the website outlines the firm’s approach: cooperation begins with an analysis of the client’s specific situation (legislation of jurisdiction, profession, education, financial situation, family composition and other parameters) in order to determine the feasibility of immigration goals. The company states that it honestly assesses prospects and does not take on a case if it considers the client’s plans unrealistic, and also offers alternative solutions (d2ed01b08e7379294231).

There, the company formulates the principles: tell the client the truth, do not underestimate risks and do not exaggerate the amount of work, maintain regular communication, do not attract clients “at any cost” and take only realistically feasible cases (d2ed01b08e7379294231). These are official company statements and not independently verified facts.

Based on the profile of its services, the firm may be relevant to those who are looking for a Russian-speaking immigration lawyer in the United States for work, family, investment categories, as well as on issues of citizenship and waivers. The specific applicability to your situation should be discussed during a consultation.

  • The declared specialization is immigration law only (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).
  • The declared experience is more than 18 years, 1000+ clients from Russian-speaking countries and from all over the world (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).
  • The stated principle is to avoid doing things with unrealistic goals and offer alternatives (d2ed01b08e7379294231).
To whom are the company's services primarily addressed?

According to the official website - for those who need an immigration lawyer in the USA; the company separately indicates work with Russian-speaking clients (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

Section sources (2)

Confirmed services and locations

The official website lists the following services: tourist visas, immigration through work, appeals, family immigration, immigration through investment, crime and fraud waivers, US citizenship (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

Office geography: the address in Connecticut is 256 Post Road East, Suite 206, Westport, CT 06880; phone numbers, WhatsApp, fax and email are provided (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

Separately, the website states cooperation with trusted law firms in other countries - Canada, the Caribbean, Great Britain, EU countries, Australia and several Asian countries - as part of “global migration” (d2ed01b08e7379294231). This is the official statement of the company; the specific composition of partners is not disclosed in the available materials.

The reviews mention different types of cases: K-1 (fiancé/fiancé visa), green card waiver, VAWA, H-1B and subsequent 221(g), and EB-5 (7a173420352451398a, c673f77442a61c5a9f, 2940f104cfa8fc6f89, e4411b72a59db92cd2, deaeb857a896ab1ad7). These are reports from reviewers and not firm-verified practice categories.

  • Services on the official website: tourist visas, work, appeals, family, investments, waivers, citizenship (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).
  • Office: Westport, CT (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).
  • Partnerships have been announced with companies in Canada, the Caribbean, UK, EU, Australia, Asia (d2ed01b08e7379294231).
Does the firm do business outside of Connecticut?

The review mentions a Texas client and employer who was accompanied on an H-1B filing (e4411b72a59db92cd2). This is a message from the reviewer; There are no official statements about the geography of practice outside the specified office in the available materials.

Section sources (2)

Russian language

The official website has a Russian-language version, and the English-language text directly states that the lawyer helped immigrants “from Russian-speaking countries” (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

The Russian-language page contains a full translation of key sections - services, philosophy, customer stories and contacts (d2ed01b08e7379294231).

In the reviews there are references to the Russian-language context (for example, “Russian American family” in the review of K-1), but this is a message from the reviewer, and not a confirmation of the company’s language policy (7a173420352451398a).

  • There is a Russian version of the site (d2ed01b08e7379294231).
  • The English version directly mentions Russian-speaking clients (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).
In what language can you communicate with the company?

The site is available in Russian and English, and the English text indicates work with Russian-speaking clients (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231). Details of language support during the consultation should be clarified directly.

Section sources (3)

Working with the company

According to the official description, the work begins with an analysis of the client’s specific situation and determination of the realistic goals; the firm says it is willing to offer alternative solutions and turn down cases with unrealistic plans (d2ed01b08e7379294231).

In reviews, clients describe support at the stages of document preparation, submission and communication with departments: for example, preparation of a voluminous package of documents and timely submission when removing conditions from a green card, as well as sending documents from USCIS to the client with explanations (c673f77442a61c5a9f). Another review describes preparing a package of documents and a letter to the US Consulate in India upon receipt of a 221(g) notice (e4411b72a59db92cd2).

These descriptions are messages from reviewers and are not officially confirmed regulations. The specific stages, timing and procedure for communication should be clarified when concluding the contract.

  • The stated start of work is an analysis of the situation and an assessment of the feasibility of goals (d2ed01b08e7379294231).
  • The reviews mention the preparation of documents, submission and correspondence with departments (c673f77442a61c5a9f, e4411b72a59db92cd2).
How is the initial assessment of a case carried out?

According to the official description - through an analysis of the client’s situation and an assessment of the feasibility of goals, with the possible proposal of alternatives (d2ed01b08e7379294231).

Section sources (3)

Fees and contract

The available materials do not contain official data on prices, tariffs or the structure of the contract on the company’s website. The only mention of cost is in the review, where the client writes that “all work was done at a reasonable price” (2940f104cfa8fc6f89). This is the subjective impression of the reviewer, and not a confirmed price.

In another review, which concerns a case other than immigration, the author notes that the fees were reasonable compared to previous lawyers (8c14a6bf8d7e144081). This is also a message from the reviewer.

Specific conditions, payment stages and the scope of work included should be clarified directly with the company before signing the contract.

  • There are no official prices in the available materials.
  • Reviews contain only general assessments of “reasonable price” (2940f104cfa8fc6f89, 8c14a6bf8d7e144081).
Are there any published prices on the website?

Prices are not published in the available official materials of the package; the reviews contain only general cost estimates (2940f104cfa8fc6f89).

Section sources (2)

Platform reviews and limitations

The available materials contain reviews from several sites: Birdeye (reviews related to the company profile), dosfinds.us, wikipropedia.com. Some reviews have the status “historical_import_not_independently_reverified” - that is, historical import without independent re-verification; identity and deduplication are inherited from the dashboard rather than independently verified (44206f4fb6ea5b0aed, 2940f104cfa8fc6f89, c673f77442a61c5a9f, 7a173420352451398a).

Historical rating observations: dosfinds.us - 4.7 out of 5 (41 reviews, verified 2026-10-07); Google - 4.5 out of 5 (37 reviews according to mytrueguard; Birdeye shows 118 Google reviews), reviewed 2026-10-07. These are historical snapshots, not current rankings, and collection coverage may have been incomplete.

Separately, the available materials show an aggregate score of 5.0 out of 5 based on 10 selected historical reviews from dosfinds.us and wikipropedia.com - this is a sample with exceptions and is not a comprehensive independent rating.

Some reviews on wikipropedia.com do not have publication dates; Some reviews on Birdeye are dated relatively (“a month ago”, “3 months ago”) without an exact date. It is not possible to restore dates using this data.

Some reviews on wikipropedia.com relate to cases other than immigration (such as bankruptcy and adversarial litigation) and may not automatically apply to the firm's immigration practice (8c14a6bf8d7e144081).

  • Platforms: Birdeye, dosfinds.us, wikipropedia.com (44206f4fb6ea5b0aed, c673f77442a61c5a9f, 7a173420352451398a).
  • The status of the reviews is historical import without independent re-verification.
  • Historical ratings: dosfinds.us 4.7/5 (41), Google 4.5/5 (37) as of 2026-10-07 - pictures, not current rating.
Can the above ratings be considered current?

No. These are historical images as of 2026-10-07 with incomplete collection coverage; the current rating for them is not determined.

Section sources (3)

Strengths mentioned in reviews

Several themes are repeated in the selected reviews: support at all stages, availability by phone and email, timely submission of documents and explanations on documents received from departments (c673f77442a61c5a9f, e4411b72a59db92cd2).

Separately, they note the work with complex cases: one review describes a won VAWA case with subsequent approval of a green card (2940f104cfa8fc6f89); in another, assistance with a 221(g) notification at the Indian Consulate followed by visa approval (e4411b72a59db92cd2).

Reviews posed as fellow attorneys mention understanding of complex areas, including EB-5, and willingness to serve as co-counsel (deaeb857a896ab1ad7, 7d9ea4e37f6d742efa). These are reports from review authors, not facts confirmed by the company.

The K-1 review notes organization and support throughout the process (7a173420352451398a).

  • Support at all stages and communication (c673f77442a61c5a9f, e4411b72a59db92cd2).
  • Complex cases: VAWA (2940f104cfa8fc6f89), 221(g) (e4411b72a59db92cd2).
  • Reviews from colleagues mention EB-5 and co-consultations (deaeb857a896ab1ad7, 7d9ea4e37f6d742efa).
What types of cases are more often mentioned in positive reviews?

The selected reviews mention K-1, green card waiver, VAWA, H-1B followed by 221(g) and EB-5 (7a173420352451398a, c673f77442a61c5a9f, 2940f104cfa8fc6f89, e4411b72a59db92cd2, deaeb857a896ab1ad7).

Section sources (3)

Company complaints and responses

In the selected sample of reviews of the package, no obvious complaints about the work of Irina Lust Law PLLC were found. All reviews given are positive.

This does not mean that there are no complaints in principle: the sample is incomplete, some reviews have the status of historical import without independent re-verification, and site coverage may have been incomplete. The absence of complaints in the available materials should not be interpreted as their absence in the market.

  • There are no complaints in the selected reviews.
  • The sample is incomplete; the absence of complaints in the available materials does not prove their absence.
Are there any negative reviews in the available materials?

There are no negative reviews in the selected sample; however, the sample is incomplete and cannot serve as evidence of the absence of complaints.

Section sources (2)

Frequently asked questions

How many years has the firm been working in immigration law?

According to the official website - more than 18 years (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231). This is the company's statement.

What categories of cases does the firm work with?

According to the official website: tourist visas, immigration through work, appeals, family immigration, immigration through investment, waivers, US citizenship (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).

Is there Russian-language support?

Yes, the site has a Russian version, and the English text indicates work with Russian-speaking clients (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8, d2ed01b08e7379294231).

Where is the office located?

According to the official website - Westport, Connecticut, 256 Post Road East, Suite 206 (e10eda71010db1d1a6d8).

Does the company publish prices?

Prices are not published in the available official materials of the package; the reviews contain only general cost estimates (2940f104cfa8fc6f89).

Is the lawyer's license confirmed in the state registry?

There is no confirmation from the state register in the materials of the package; It is recommended to check it yourself.

What types of cases are mentioned in the reviews?

K-1, removal of green card conditions, VAWA, H-1B with 221(g), EB-5 (7a173420352451398a, c673f77442a61c5a9f, 2940f104cfa8fc6f89, e4411b72a59db92cd2, deaeb857a896ab1ad7).

Can the above ratings be considered current?

No, these are historical images for 2026-10-07 with incomplete collection coverage.

Section sources (5)

What clients say

The summaries below describe available accounts with attribution. A reviewer's statements are not established facts about the company.

Positive experience

Support at all stages

The author of the review on the removal of conditions from the green card notes the preparation of a voluminous package of documents, timely submission, availability by phone and e-mail, as well as prompt transmission of documents from USCIS with explanations.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports that the conditions for the green card have been lifted: a voluminous package of documents was submitted on time, the interview was cancelled, communication by phone and mail.

dosfinds.us ↗Date of publication: a year ago (exact date not established)

Dealing with complex cases

The review describes a VAWA case won and subsequent green card approval; The author notes the clear and concise responses to the consultation.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author describes a complex VAWA case: clear responses to consultation, winning the case, and subsequent green card approval at a reasonable cost.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 3 months ago (exact date not established)

221(g) Administrative Review Assistance

The author of the review describes the preparation of a package of documents and a letter to the US Consulate in India, as well as support until obtaining a visa stamp.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author describes H-1B approval, then 221(g) notification in India, preparing the package and letter to the consulate, visa approval.

wikipropedia.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Getting Organized in K-1 Case

The author of the review about the fiancé/fiancé visa notes the expertise, organization and support throughout the process.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author recommends a lawyer for a K-1 case: expertise, organization and support throughout the entire process.

wikipropedia.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Understanding of complex areas (based on feedback from colleagues)

The authors, who identify themselves as fellow lawyers, mention an understanding of the nuances of EB-5 and a willingness to serve as co-counsel.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

Fellow author notes understanding of the nuances of EB-5 and the law, useful judgment on the case.

wikipropedia.com ↗Publication date: unknown

A fellow author writes about growing legal expertise, successful client referrals, and working as a co-counsel.

wikipropedia.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Reasonable cost (according to reviews)

In the reviews there are general assessments of the cost as reasonable; There are no specific figures in the available materials.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

The author describes a complex VAWA case: clear responses to consultation, winning the case, and subsequent green card approval at a reasonable cost.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 3 months ago (exact date not established)

The author reports on hiring after unsuccessful attorneys: persistence, reasonable fees, attention to detail, settlement.

wikipropedia.com ↗Publication date: unknown

What are they complaining about?

Verified complaint topics have not yet been published. This is not a statement about the absence of negative experiences.

Sources and updates

Observation dates are indicated at the sites and in the profile materials.

Full methodology and limitations

Irina Lust Law PLLC reviews

Write a review

Share your experience working with the company

Your rating
Select from 1 to 5 stars
What to write in a review
  • At what stage did you work with the company: consultation, preparation or submission of documents?
  • How was your communication and work, what did you like or caused difficulties?
  • What result was obtained or at what stage is the matter now?

Describe your personal experience. Do not indicate document numbers and other people's personal data.

From 30 to 3000 characters

Review will appear after verification.

Explore other companies

Few reviews yet

Comparison available from 20 reviews. There is not enough data yet to confidently assess the company.

What does the number of ratings mean?

One person can leave reviews on several platforms. The number of ratings does not equal the number of unique customers.

A small sample provides less basis for generalizations. A large sample also does not guarantee the quality of the service or the outcome of the case.

More about the sample

Report an issue

Point out any inaccuracies in the text, estimates, or company data.