✦immigration-reviews.ru
Company profile

Law Offices of Ama-Mariya Hoffenden reviews

Law firm in Hollywood, Florida, with a primary focus in immigration law and additional areas of expertise in criminal defense and family law. Based on its own website materials, the firm claims Russian-speaking lawyers and work with family, business and labor immigration. There is no independent confirmation of licenses in the state register as part of this package.

Business and employmentAsylum and defense
Official website ↗

Reviews of Law Offices of Ama-Mariya Hoffenden: how to read profile materials

The Law Offices of Ama-Mariya Hoffenden profile contains available materials about client experiences and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.

Reviews and ratings · Sources · Methodology · JSON profile data

Platform ratings

The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.

Site and typePointsQuantityDate of observation
experience.comHistorical site card4.68 / 5.0Unknown
birdeye.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating4.4 / 5.0118
trustburn.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating4.2 / 5.010

Consider the date and boundaries of the sample. Old observations do not guarantee that the site's rating is the same today.

Facts and data boundaries

Company overview

Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
Russian, English, Spanish (according to reviews)
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026.
Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates

Declared service areas

  • Immigration Law
  • E-2 Visa for Investors
  • EB-5 Visa for Investors
  • Political asylum
  • K1 Fiancé/Groom Visa
  • Petition I-130 for relatives
  • L-1 visa for workers
  • Criminal Defense (DUI/DWI, Domestic Violence, Theft, Drugs, Violent Crimes, Robbery, Assault, Expungement)
  • Family law

A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.

Specialization and suitable clients

According to the description on the official website, the firm positions immigration law as its main focus and states that it helps with family immigration, as well as business and work visas. On its website, the firm describes itself as an option for those who need an immigration lawyer in South and Central Florida.

Additionally, the firm lists criminal defense and family law as related practices. This means that a potential client can apply both on a purely immigration issue and on overlapping topics (for example, criminal consequences for immigration status), but specific links are not disclosed in the sources.

The firm addresses its services to people moving to the United States as family members of a resident or citizen, as well as to those coming for business or work purposes. Individual consultation is required to assess applicability to a specific situation.

  • Main focus is immigration law.
  • Additional areas include criminal defense and family law.
  • Geographic location: South and Central Florida, office in Hollywood.
Is the company suitable if my question is not related to immigration?

The site lists criminal defense and family law as additional areas, but how deeply the firm handles such cases is not clear from the package's sources. This should be clarified during the consultation.

Section sources (1)

Confirmed services and locations

The official website lists specific immigration products: E-2 and EB-5 investor visas, political asylum, K1 visa, I-130 petition and L-1 visa. For E-2 and EB-5, the website has separate pages describing the requirements and steps.

For E-2, the site states that the visa allows the investor to move to the United States to develop a business in which the applicant owns at least 50%, and that the stay is possible with unlimited two-year extensions while maintaining eligibility. For EB-5, the site mentions investment and job creation, and also describes steps through Forms I-526, I-485, and consular processing with DS-260.

Geography: The site lists the office as 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 165-S, Hollywood, FL 33021, and claims to serve clients in St. Petersburg, Gainesville, Pensacola and the rest of South and Central Florida. This is an official statement by the company and not an independently verified fact.

  • E-2: Declared ownership of at least 50% of the business and two year extensions.
  • EB-5: Steps I-526, I-485, and consular processing (DS-260) claimed.
  • K1: Declared marriage within 90 days of entry.
  • L-1: Declared transportation of employees to the United States after at least one year of employment with the company in the last three years.
  • I-130: Stated as the first step for relocating a family member of a citizen or resident.
What visas does the company directly name on the website?

E-2, EB-5, K1, L-1, Asylum and I-130 Petition. This is a list from the official website and not an independent verification of practice.

Section sources (3)

Russian language

The firm's website contains an EN/RU switch and explicitly states that it has Russian-speaking lawyers. The team section lists Ama-Mariya Hoffenden (Lead Associate/Founder), Olena Green (Senior Litigation Analyst) and Tatsiana Bartash (Legal Assistant).

Russian-language reviews on third-party sites also indicate working with Russian-speaking clients, however, these are individual messages from the authors, and not confirmation of the language competencies of the entire team.

  • Website: EN/RU switch and statement about Russian-speaking lawyers.
  • The team lists three people, including Russian-language names.
  • There are Russian-language reviews on Birdeye (including negative ones).
Is it possible to conduct business in Russian?

The site claims Russian-speaking lawyers and an EN/RU switch. The specific composition of the Russian-speaking team should be clarified when applying.

Section sources (2)

Collaboration process: what is known and what needs to be clarified

From official materials it follows that the company offers consultations and support: preparation of documents, business plan (for E-2 and EB-5), preparation for interviews and support in court. The site emphasizes that the client needs to provide documents and evidence, and the firm takes on the legal work.

For E-2, the site describes the sequence: confirmation of source of funds, payment of fees, active business with a physical address, interview at the US Embassy. For EB-5 - filing I-526, then I-485 or consular processing, interview and possible appeals.

What exactly is included in the contract, how communication is organized, who personally conducts the case and how documents are transferred is not disclosed in the sources of the package. It is logical to ask these questions before signing the contract.

  • Provided support from document preparation to interviews.
  • For E-2 and EB-5, assistance with a business plan is claimed.
  • For EB-5, assistance with appeals and petitions for reconsideration is claimed.
  • The composition of the agreement and the procedure for communication are not described in the sources.
Who will handle my business?

The site names Ama-Mariya Hoffenden as lead lawyer and founder, as well as Olena Green and Tatsiana Bartash. Who exactly is assigned to a specific case is not indicated in the sources.

Section sources (3)

Fees and contract

The website lists individual government fees. For E-2: DS-160 - $205, Basic I-129 - $460, Expedited - $1,440. For EB-5: I-526 - $3675, I-485 - from $750 to $1140 depending on age, biometrics - $85; for consular processing - DS-260 - $230, biometrics - $85, affidavit of support - $85.

The company's fees on the website are not given specific figures: the language used is competitive prices. Time frame: according to E-2, the site indicates a guideline of two weeks to four months for processing and organizing interviews; for EB-5 - from six months or more. These are official statements of the company and not guarantees.

The terms of the contract, payment procedure, refund and division of fees and charges are not disclosed in the package sources.

  • State fees for E-2: 205 + 460 + 1440 dollars (according to the site).
  • State fees for EB-5: 3675 + 750–1140 + 85 dollars (according to the site).
  • The company's fees are not specified in specific figures.
  • Terms: E-2 - from two weeks to four months; EB-5 - six months or more.
How much do the company's services cost?

The website lists only government fees; fees are described as competitive, without specific amounts. The exact cost must be confirmed directly.

Section sources (2)

Platform reviews and limitations

The available materials contain historical observations from several sites: experience.com - 4.68 out of 5 (81 reviews), birdeye.com - 4.4 out of 5 (118 reviews), trustburn.com - 4.2 out of 5 (10 reviews). These numbers are a historical snapshot, not current rankings, and fee coverage may not be complete.

The selected sample of 14 reviews is not an exhaustive independent rating: some sources were not collected, some reviews could be excluded. Identification and deduplication are inherited from the dashboard and have not been independently verified.

Reviews are distributed unevenly: on trustburn.com positive ones predominate, on birdeye.com there are sharply negative Russian-language reviews. Google and its mirror Birdeye are different platforms and cannot be mixed. The publication of the review is not equal to the date of the review.

  • experience.com: 4.68/5 (81 reviews) - Historical snapshot.
  • birdeye.com: 4.4/5 (118 reviews) - historical photo.
  • trustburn.com: 4.2/5 (10 reviews) - Historical snapshot.
  • The sample is not exhaustive; Some sources were not collected.
Can these ratings be considered current?

No. These are historical observations for a specific date with incomplete coverage. They do not reflect current conditions and are not an independent rating.

Section sources (4)

Strengths mentioned in reviews

Positive reviews on experience.com and trustburn.com report a professional and knowledgeable team, caring attitude, and positive results. One author on experience.com specifically mentions lawyers Olena and Ama-Mariya and thanks them for supporting the documents.

On trustburn.com, several authors write about the professional team, information on progress and prompt responses to questions. These messages are the author's impressions and not established facts about the quality of services.

Separately, it is worth noting that some of the positive reviews on trustburn.com are of a general nature and similar wording, which makes it difficult to assess their independence.

  • The authors report a professional and knowledgeable team.
  • Mention is made of being informed along the way and answering questions.
  • One author thanks specific lawyers for supporting documents.
What is most often praised in reviews?

Professionalism of the team, information and support of documents. These are opinion pieces, not verified facts.

Section sources (3)

Specific complaints and company responses

There are two sharply negative Russian-language reviews on birdeye.com (both marked “4 years ago” at the time of collection). One author reports that the work was not completed, the money was not returned, and does not advise contacting. Another author reports documents submitted with errors, inability to get through by phone, late submission and refusal to return money.

These reports are opinionated complaints, not established facts. There are no company responses to these reviews in the package sources. The exact publication dates are not indicated (the relative label “4 years ago” is used), so reference to a calendar date is not possible.

The full texts of reviews and names of authors should not be published; Here is a brief summary of the essence of the complaints.

  • Birdeye: complaint about work not completed and money not returned.
  • Birdeye: complaint about errors in documents, unavailability of communication and late submission.
  • The company's responses to these reviews are not available in the sources.
  • The dates are relative (“4 years ago”), the exact date is unknown.
Does the company respond to negative reviews?

The company's response package to these reviews is not available in the sources. This does not mean that they did not exist; they are simply not reflected in the collected materials.

Section sources (1)

What clients say

The summaries below describe available accounts with attribution. A reviewer's statements are not established facts about the company.

Positive experience

Team professionalism

Authors of positive reviews report a professional and knowledgeable team with an attentive attitude to business.

Examples in the available selection: 3
View evidence

The author thanks lawyers Olena and Ama-Mariya and the team for the perfect support of the documents.

experience.com ↗Publication date: 2025-09-13

The author calls the company excellent, the team professional and knowledgeable, and the results favorable.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

The author reports a professional and attentive team and a positive outcome of the case.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 2 years ago (exact date not established)

Information and support

The authors report information on the progress of the case, answers to questions and support of documents.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

The author notes competent lawyers, information on the progress of the case and quick responses.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

The author thanks lawyers Olena and Ama-Mariya and the team for the perfect support of the documents.

experience.com ↗Publication date: 2025-09-13

What are they complaining about?

Unfinished work and refunds

The author of the review on Birdeye reports that the work was not completed and the money was not returned.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports that the work was not completed, the money was not returned, and does not advise contacting.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 years ago (exact date not established)

Errors in documents and communication

The author of the review on Birdeye reports errors in the submitted documents, inability to get through by phone, and late submission.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports errors in documents, inability to get through by phone, late submission and non-refund of money.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 years ago (exact date not established)

Sources and updates

Observation dates are indicated at the sites and in the profile materials.

Full methodology and limitations

Law Offices of Ama-Mariya Hoffenden reviews

Write a review

Share your experience working with the company

Your rating
Select from 1 to 5 stars
What to write in a review
  • At what stage did you work with the company: consultation, preparation or submission of documents?
  • How was your communication and work, what did you like or caused difficulties?
  • What result was obtained or at what stage is the matter now?

Describe your personal experience. Do not indicate document numbers and other people's personal data.

From 30 to 3000 characters

Review will appear after verification.

Explore other companies

Few reviews yet

Comparison available from 20 reviews. There is not enough data yet to confidently assess the company.

What does the number of ratings mean?

One person can leave reviews on several platforms. The number of ratings does not equal the number of unique customers.

A small sample provides less basis for generalizations. A large sample also does not guarantee the quality of the service or the outcome of the case.

More about the sample

Report an issue

Point out any inaccuracies in the text, estimates, or company data.