✦immigration-reviews.ru
Company profile

Klasko Immigration Law Partners reviews

American immigration law firm (Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP) with offices in Philadelphia, New York and Washington. According to its own description on the website, it works with corporate clients, individual applicants, universities and hospitals, regional centers and developers, investors and startups; stated practices are EB-5, corporate immigration, EB-1, workplace compliance, global immigration, and immigration litigation. The Russian-language service has not been confirmed by verified official sources.

Extraordinary ability and NIWBusiness and employment
Official website ↗

Reviews of Klasko Immigration Law Partners: how to read profile materials

The profile of Klasko Immigration Law Partners contains available materials about client experience and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.

Reviews and ratings · Sources · Methodology · JSON profile data

Platform ratings

The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.

Site and typePointsQuantityDate of observation
avvo.comHistorical site card5.0 / 5.0Unknown
lawyers.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating4.8 / 5.03
Worldorgs - Google mirrorPublished card, direct checkIncluded in the rating3.9 / 519Date unknown

Consider the date and boundaries of the sample. Old observations do not guarantee that the site's rating is the same today.

Facts and data boundaries

Company overview

Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
Not confirmed in this version
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026.
Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates

Declared service areas

  • EB-5 Immigration
  • Corporate Immigration
  • EB-1 Immigration
  • Worksite Compliance
  • Global Immigration
  • Immigration Litigation

A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.

Specialization and suitable clients

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP positions itself as an immigration law firm with an international reputation, offering solutions for organizations and individuals. The home page lists six practices: EB-5, Corporate Immigration, EB-1, Workplace Compliance, Global Immigration, and Immigration Litigation.

The firm identifies several groups of clients: corporations with sponsored employees (including high-volume filings, non-standard cases and policy development), individuals in the labor, investment, marriage and family categories, universities, hospitals and research institutes, regional centers and real estate developers, investors, and startups.

According to the EB-5 practice description, the team works with all parties to the program: investors, regional centers and project developers, including support during project failures and litigation. This indicates a focus primarily on business immigration and investment categories rather than a broad range of family or humanitarian affairs.

  • Corporations with sponsored employees and large filing volumes.
  • Individuals: labor categories, investments, marriage, family.
  • Universities, hospitals, research institutes and their employees.
  • Regional centers and developers of EB-5 projects.
  • Investors and startups.
Is the firm suitable for a private applicant without a sponsoring employer?

The website states that the company works with individuals by labor category, as well as through investments, marriage or family. Specific applicability to your situation should be clarified during your consultation.

Section sources (2)

Confirmed services and locations

The official site lists practices EB-5, Corporate Immigration, EB-1, Workplace Compliance, Global Immigration, and Immigration Litigation. Section EB-5 describes services for direct investors (enterprise structuring, documenting legal source of funds, I-829 release), for regional centers and developers (Forms I-956, I-956F, I-956H, annual reports, amendments, responses to RFEs, notice of intent to terminate protection), and compliance and services for lawyers and agents.

Geography of offices according to the site: Philadelphia (2000 Market Street, Suite 1050), New York (261 Madison Ave, Office 916) and Washington, DC (1 Thomas Cir NW, Suite 700). Phones and faxes are listed for each office.

Section EB-5 mentions that the firm is one of the large full-service immigration law firms, which allows it to help clients with other immigration issues - travel permits, naturalization, sponsorship of family members.

  • EB-5: services to investors, regional centers, developers, compliance, litigation.
  • Corporate Immigration, EB-1, Global Immigration, Compliance, Litigation.
  • Offices: Philadelphia, New York, Washington (DC).
  • Additionally: travel permits, naturalization, family sponsorship (as described in the EB-5 section).
What EB-5 forms does the site mention?

Among others: I-956 (application for designation of a regional center), I-956F (approval of a project), I-956H (for persons associated with a regional center), I-829 (removal of conditions). This is a description of services and not a guarantee of results.

Section sources (3)

Russian language

In verified official sources (main page, team page, EB-5 practice page) the Russian language is not indicated. The site and materials are presented in English. Some reviews on third-party sites are written in Russian, but these are customer reviews and not confirmation of the company’s Russian-language service.

Questions about the availability of Russian-speaking staff or a translator should be asked to the company directly; There is no evidence of this in the available materials.

  • Official pages are in English.
  • The Russian-language service has not been confirmed by official sources.
  • Russian-language reviews on third-party sites do not prove the presence of Russian-language service.
Is it possible to conduct business in Russian?

This has not been confirmed in verified official sources. Check with the company directly.

Section sources (3)

Working with the company

The website states that the firm offers “extreme responsiveness” and innovative, practical and effective strategies; To get in touch, we invite you to sign up for a consultation. This is the company's official statement about its service.

Section EB-5 describes options for interacting with lawyers and agents: the lawyer prepares the petition, and Klasko reviews; Klasko prepares the petition and is the main consultant with direct contact with the client; Klasko advises developers on new regional center; judicial appeal of refusals or delays. This is a description of operating patterns and not a guarantee of a specific outcome.

From reviews on third-party sites, it is clear that clients mention interaction with specific employees (for example, with a paralegal and a case manager), but these are author’s messages and not official data from the company.

  • Officially: book a consultation, stated “extreme responsiveness.”
  • EB-5 work models: petition review, petition preparation, developer consulting, judicial appeal.
  • EB-5 work models: petition review, petition preparation, developer consulting, judicial appeal.
How to start working with the company?

The website invites you to sign up for a consultation using a form. Specific steps and conditions should be clarified with the company.

Section sources (2)

Fees and contract

In verified official sources (home page, team page, EB-5 page) specific prices, tariffs or contract terms are not indicated. The site has a “Pay Invoice” section and mentions a consultation, but without amounts.

One of the reviews on a third-party site mentions a consultation fee of $300, but this is an opinion piece and not an official endorsement by the company. Another review contains general words about the process, without numbers.

Questions to ask before the contract: cost of consultation, fee structure (fixed or hourly), what is included in the service, terms of termination and return, who exactly will handle the case.

  • Official prices have not been published in trusted sources.
  • The review mentions a consultation for $300 - this is the author's message, not official data.
  • Specify: fee, scope of services, terms of termination and return.
How much does a consultation cost?

The cost is not indicated in verified official sources. One review mentions $300, but this is an opinion piece and not an official endorsement.

Section sources (2)

Platform reviews and limitations

The sources studied include reviews from several sites: worldorgs.com, birdeye.com, otzovikon.com, otzyv.pro. Some of the reviews on otzyv.pro and otzovikon.com in content refer to another company (“Migrator”), and not to Klasko; such reviews should not be transferred to Klasko. This is a limitation of the sample.

Historical rating observations: on avvo.com recorded 5.0 (6 reviews), on lawyers.com - 4.8 (3 reviews), check date 2026-10-07. This is a historical snapshot, not a current ranking; fee coverage may not be complete.

The selected sample, with exceptions, does not constitute a comprehensive independent ranking. Some reviews do not have a publication date; status - historical import without independent re-verification.

  • Sites in the studied sources: worldorgs.com, birdeye.com, otzovikon.com, otzyv.pro.
  • Some of the reviews on otzyv.pro and otzovikon.com refer to another company - do not transfer to Klasko.
  • Historical ratings: avvo.com 5.0 (6), lawyers.com 4.8 (3), reviewed 2026-10-07.
  • The sample is not exhaustive; Some reviews are undated.
Can a 5.0 rating on avvo be considered current?

No, this is a historical observation from 2026-10-07; collection coverage may be incomplete, and the photo is not issued for the current rating.

Section sources (5)

Complaints in reviews and company responses

There is an undated review on birdeye.com in which the author reports a consultation for $300, claims that the lawyer did not familiarize himself with the case and cited a travel ban, after which the author contacted the State Department and another firm. The company's response to this review is not available in the sources studied.

There is an undated review on worldorgs.com in which the author claims that the firm is not an expert in the technical requirements of the visa, does not read the requirements and prepares drafts poorly, and that this has led to denials and problems with future entries. There is no response from the company in the sources studied.

There is also an undated review about slow responses (1-2 days for a simple question). There is no response from the company in the sources studied.

  • Consultation for $300, statement of lack of knowledge of the case (b754f379bb06116be5) - no response from the company.
  • Allegation of ignorance of technical visa requirements and poor preparation (303716ae80ccb25977) - no response from the company.
  • Slow responses 1-2 days (e0e259e5f15079066e) - no response from the company.
  • Approval of cancellation of employment after consultation (100e62bb08a2566a6d) - no response from the company.
What is most often praised in reviews?

In the sources studied, there are no company responses to the listed complaints.

Section sources (2)

Specific complaints with date/URL and company responses

There is an undated review on birdeye.com in which the author reports a consultation for $300, claims that the lawyer did not familiarize himself with the case and cited a travel ban, after which the author contacted the State Department and another firm. The company's response to this review is not available in the available materials.

It also makes sense to independently check the status of a lawyer in the registry of the relevant state, since the verification of licenses in the state registry is not reflected in the sources studied.

There is also an undated review about slow responses (1-2 days for a simple question). There is no response from the company in the available materials.

Another undated review: The author claims that the firm did not file an RFE and reported the unsafe situation to the employer, after which the employer canceled the employment. There is no response from the company in the sources studied.

All these messages are author's reviews, not established facts; There are no publication dates in the sources studied, so it is impossible to indicate the date.

  • Consultation for $300, statement of lack of knowledge of the case (b754f379bb06116be5) - no response from the company.
  • Allegation of ignorance of technical visa requirements and poor preparation (303716ae80ccb25977) - no response from the company.
  • Slow responses 1-2 days (e0e259e5f15079066e) - no response from the company.
  • Approval of cancellation of employment after consultation (100e62bb08a2566a6d) - no response from the company.
Does the company respond to complaints?

Who is in charge of the case, fee structure, scope of services and termination conditions; as well as the presence of a Russian-language service, if this is important.

Section sources (2)

Frequently asked questions

How is a lawyer's license verified?

In the sources studied, verification of licenses in the state register is not reflected. It is recommended that you independently check the status of the lawyer in the registry of the appropriate state.

Is there a Russian-language service?

The Russian-language service is not confirmed in verified official sources. Check with the company directly.

What EB-5 work models are offered?

According to the site description: checking a petition, preparing a petition, consulting developers, judicial appeal of refusals or delays.

How to start working with the company?

The website invites you to sign up for a consultation using a form. Specific steps and conditions should be clarified with the company.

Does the company respond to complaints?

In the sources studied, there are no company responses to the listed complaints.

Section sources (3)

Low scores and card borders

The Worldorgs card for Klasko in Philadelphia reads complaints about technical document preparation, consultation and employment implications. These are the words of the authors, the fault of the company is not established.

The card shows 3.9/5 from 19 reviews and contains a link to klaskolaw.com. This is a mirror; it only counts once in the Google family. The date of the original rating is not specified.

A separate Lawyers.com card also remains in the calculation: 4.8/5 based on 3 ratings. Individual negative texts are not added on top of the full rating of the same site.

Section sources (1)

What clients say

The summaries below describe available accounts with attribution. A reviewer's statements are not established facts about the company.

Positive experience

Professionalism and responsiveness

Customer reviews report professionalism, responsiveness and careful preparation of documents.

Examples in the available sample: 4
View evidence

The client thanks the team for removing the conditions and naturalizing the spouse, noting their efficiency and responsiveness.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

The client calls the company professional and responsive, mentions interaction with a paralegal.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

The client notes quick responses, peace of mind and support throughout the entire immigration process.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 months ago (exact date not established)

The client notes the professional and thorough preparation of documents for his and his wife's petition.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Long-term support

Reviewers mention years of support in various categories, including H-1B, I-140, EAD, I-131, I-485, removal of conditions and naturalization.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

Client thanks for 14 years of support on H-1B, I-140, EAD, I-131 and I-485.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Client notes professionalism, responsiveness, and support on multiple petitions, including an unusual driver's license issue.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Help in stressful situations

Reviews note clear answers and support during stressful periods, including a non-standard question with a driver's license.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

The client notes quick responses, peace of mind and support throughout the entire immigration process.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 months ago (exact date not established)

Client notes professionalism, responsiveness, and support on multiple petitions, including an unusual driver's license issue.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

What are they complaining about?

Quality of consultation

The author of the review claims that during the paid consultation, the lawyer did not familiarize himself with the case and referred to the travel ban; There is no response from the company in the available materials.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author claims that during the paid consultation, the lawyer did not familiarize himself with the case and referred to the travel ban.

birdeye.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Technical training

The author of the review claims that the company does not know the technical requirements of the visa and does not prepare drafts well; There is no response from the company in the available materials.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author claims that the company does not know the technical requirements of the visa and does not prepare drafts well.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Response rate

The reviewer reports slow responses (1-2 days for a simple question); There is no response from the company in the available materials.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports slow responses: 1–2 days even for a simple question.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Employment implications

The author of the review claims that after consultation the employer canceled the employment; There is no response from the company in the available materials.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author claims that after consultation, the employer canceled the employment.

worldorgs.com ↗Publication date: unknown

Sources and updates

Observation dates are indicated at the sites and in the profile materials.

Full methodology and limitations

Klasko Immigration Law Partners reviews

Write a review

Share your experience working with the company

Your rating
Select from 1 to 5 stars
What to write in a review
  • At what stage did you work with the company: consultation, preparation or submission of documents?
  • How was your communication and work, what did you like or caused difficulties?
  • What result was obtained or at what stage is the matter now?

Describe your personal experience. Do not indicate document numbers and other people's personal data.

From 30 to 3000 characters

Review will appear after verification.

Explore other companies

Few reviews yet

Comparison available from 20 reviews. There is not enough data yet to confidently assess the company.

What does the number of ratings mean?

One person can leave reviews on several platforms. The number of ratings does not equal the number of unique customers.

A small sample provides less basis for generalizations. A large sample also does not guarantee the quality of the service or the outcome of the case.

More about the sample

Report an issue

Point out any inaccuracies in the text, estimates, or company data.