✦immigration-reviews.ru
Company profile

Jackson Lewis P.C. reviews

A large American law firm self-described as specializing in labor and immigration law on the employer side. The selection of sources includes official company pages, catalogs and historical reviews; Some reviews relate to other individuals and sites and cannot be transferred to the company.

Business and employment
Official website ↗

Reviews of Jackson Lewis P.C.: how to read profile materials

In the profile of Jackson Lewis P.C. collected available materials about customer experience and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.

Reviews and ratings · Sources · Methodology · JSON profile data

Platform ratings

The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.

Site and typePointsQuantityDate of observation
experience.comHistorical site card2.5 / 5.0Unknown
google.comHistorical site card5.0 / 5.0Unknown
google.comHistorical site card4.0 / 5.0Unknown
lawyers.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.038
lawyers.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.038
lawyers.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating3.0 / 5.038
lawyers.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.038
lawyers.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.0Unknown
birdeye.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.04
birdeye.comHistorical site card1.4 / 5.07
birdeye.comHistorical site card5.0 / 5.04
birdeye.comHistorical site card3.5 / 5.04
birdeye.comHistorical site card3.0 / 5.02
birdeye.comHistorical site card5.0 / 5.02
birdeye.comHistorical site card3.7 / 5.06
birdeye.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating1.3 / 5.010
birdeye.comHistorical site card3.7 / 5.023

Consider the date and boundaries of the sample. Old observations do not guarantee that the site's rating is the same today.

Facts and data boundaries

Company overview

Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
English
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026.
Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates

Declared service areas

  • Immigration
  • International Employment
  • Employment Litigation
  • Labor Relations
  • Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
  • ERISA Complex Litigation
  • Wage and Hour
  • Workplace Safety and Health
  • Corporate Diversity Counseling
  • Class Actions and Complex Litigation

A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.

Specialization and suitable clients

According to the official description on the website, Jackson Lewis P.C. is a “management-side labor and employment law firm”, that is, a company working on the side of employers, and not individual workers. The contact page explicitly states that the firm does not respond to communications from individuals seeking legal assistance, and that sending a message does not create an attorney-client relationship.

The official About Us page describes the firm as having focused on labor and immigration law since 1958, with more than 1,100 attorneys in major U.S. cities. Awards and ratings are also stated there: Chambers USA 2026, Chambers Global Band 2 in Labor & Employment, Legal 500 Leading Firm, AmLaw 100 2026, BTI Complex Employment Litigation Powerhouse 2026, Best Lawyers 2027, Best Law Firms 2026, IEL Elite 2026. These are official statements of the company, and not data independently verified by us.

The service index on the official website lists Immigration, International Employment, Employment Litigation, Labor Relations, Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, ERISA Complex Litigation, Wage and Hour, Workplace Safety and Health, Corporate Diversity Counseling, Class Actions and Complex Litigation, among others. This is a description of practices and not an endorsement of specific case results.

  • Aimed at employers rather than individuals seeking immigration representation.
  • Immigration is listed as a separate practice in the official service index.
  • International practice is described through International Employment and relationships with L&E Global.
  • The firm, according to its own statement, does not respond to requests for legal assistance from individuals.
Is the firm suitable for an individual seeking an immigration lawyer?

According to the official contact page, the firm explicitly states that it does not respond to messages from individuals seeking legal assistance and works on the side of employers. This is a direct check question if you are an individual.

What practices are officially declared?

The official index of services lists Immigration, International Employment, Employment Litigation, Labor Relations and other labor block practices.

Section sources (3)

Confirmed services and locations

The official service index confirms the presence of Immigration, International Employment, Employment Litigation and Labor Relations practices. The About Us page describes local US offices and national practice groups, as well as international practice through International Employment and relationships with L&E Global.

The selection contains many directory pages with office addresses in different US cities (including New York, Miami, Philadelphia, Seattle, St. Louis, Dallas, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Chicago, Cincinnati, San Francisco, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Memphis, San Juan). These pages are third-party directories and are not an official confirmation of the current office lineup; they should be checked separately.

The official contact page does not contain a list of offices in the extracted text, so the specific composition of offices according to the official source is not confirmed here.

  • Immigration - confirmed by the official service index.
  • International Employment - confirmed by the official service index and About Us page.
  • Employment Litigation and Labor Relations - confirmed by the official service index.
  • Geography: officially announced offices in the USA; A specific list of offices is not provided in the extracted official texts.
Does the firm have an immigration practice?

Yes, Immigration is listed in the official service index on the company’s website.

Does the company operate outside the US?

International practice is officially declared through International Employment and relations with L&E Global; This is a description of practice and not an endorsement of specific cases.

Section sources (2)

Russian language

The selection does not contain official confirmation of Russian-language service. Official pages of the company in English; There is no mention of the Russian language or Russian-speaking employees in the extracted texts.

One review on otzovik.com is written in Russian and mentions "Migrator", but this review does not apply to Jackson Lewis P.C. and cannot serve as confirmation of the company's service language. It is included in the collection, but is not associated with this company.

  • There is no official confirmation of the Russian language in the sources.
  • The Russian-language review in the selection refers to another company and is not transferred to Jackson Lewis P.C.
Does the company provide services in Russian?

There is no confirmation from available official sources. This is a question for direct verification with the company.

Section sources (3)

Working with the company

Officially confirmed: the firm works on the side of employers and does not respond to requests from individuals seeking legal assistance; Submission of a communication through the Site does not create an attorney-client relationship and does not preclude the firm from representing another party in the same matter.

It is officially stated that the firm analyzes the legal issues and business goals of the client and develops a strategy taking into account both, and also offers flexible payment plans. This is a description of an approach and not a guarantee of specific conditions.

What is worth clarifying during the consultation: who exactly will conduct the case, how communication is organized, what terms and stages are expected, how the contract is drawn up and what payment terms are applicable to your type of case.

  • Fact: the company claims to work only on the employers' side.
  • Fact: Communication via the website does not create an attorney-client relationship.
  • Question for consultation: who personally conducts the business and how communication is organized.
  • Question for consultation: what payment terms and agreements apply to your business.
Does contacting the site create a relationship with an attorney?

No, according to the official text of the contact page, sending a message does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Can the firm represent the opposing party if I have already written to them?

According to the official text, the firm indicates that the information in the communication will not prevent it from representing the other party in the same matter.

Section sources (2)

Fees and contract

Officially, on the About Us page it is stated that the company is working with employers on flexible fee arrangements. Specific rates, ranges and conditions are not given in the sources.

There are some mentions of high prices and dissatisfaction with quality in the reviews (for example, a review on birdeye.com with the wording “high priced, poor quality lawyer”), but this is the author’s report, not an established fact, and it relates to the specific experience of the author.

What should be clarified before the contract: the fee structure (hourly, fixed, hybrid), who exactly issues the invoice, what expenses are reimbursed separately, how changes in the scope of work are formalized.

  • Flexible payment schemes for employers have been officially announced.
  • Specific rates and conditions have not been confirmed in the sources.
  • There is criticism of the price in the reviews; These are author's reports, not established facts.
Does the company have fixed prices?

The sources do not provide specific rates; Flexible payment schemes have been officially announced. Check directly.

Section sources (2)

Platform reviews and limitations

The selection contains historical snapshots of ratings on several sites. On lawyers.com, the aggregate rating is shown as 3.0 out of 5 with 38 reviews (several city pages return the same set). There are different sets on birdeye.com: for example, 1.3/10, 1.4/7, 3.0/4, 3.5/4, 3.7/6, 3.7/23, 5.0/2, 5.0/4. On experience.com - 2.5/5. On Google Maps in some locations - 5.0 and 4.0 without indicating the number of reviews. These are historical observations and not a current ranking.

An important limitation: some of the reviews in the collection refer to other persons and sites. For example, a review on otzovik.com is written in Russian and mentions Migrator, not Jackson Lewis P.C. Such materials are not transferred to the company.

The collection also contains reviews where the author describes himself as an employee (“Employed going on 12 yrs”), and reviews where the names of specific lawyers are mentioned. We do not transfer a lawyer's review to a firm without a proven connection and do not confuse employee and client.

The selection is not a comprehensive independent rating: the collection may have been incomplete, some reviews have been truncated, and company identification in the dashboard is inherited rather than independently verified.

  • lawyers.com: historically 3.0/5 with 38 reviews (several city pages).
  • birdeye.com: different sets, from 1.3/10 to 5.0/2 and 5.0/4.
  • experience.com: historically 2.5/5.
  • Google Maps: individual locations 5.0 and 4.0 without number of reviews.
  • The Russian-language review on otzovik.com refers to another company and is not transferred to the company.
  • The sample is not exhaustive; Some reviews have been cut off.
Can these ratings be considered current?

No, these are historical photographs; collection coverage may have been incomplete, and some reviews relate to other individuals and venues.

Why is there a Russian-language review about another company in the selection?

It was included in the source set, but belongs to another company and is not transferred to Jackson Lewis P.C.

Section sources (5)

Strengths mentioned in reviews

Reviews on birdeye.com contain positive descriptions: fast and efficient work, competent paralegals and lawyer, responsiveness over the phone, clear online system, timely and frequent communication. One author compares the experience with another large immigration firm.

There are reviews of the professional handling of the case and the “smooth” process, as well as the fact that the lawyers will “fight” and keep the client informed. These reports are the author's own and not established facts.

The positive experience of consultation with the provision of useful information is specifically mentioned.

  • Fast and efficient work, competent paralegals and lawyer (3093fbdcebcbad171d).
  • Clear online system and timely communication (3093fbdcebcbad171d).
  • Professional case management, “smooth” process (ee50738ff7f98c5cf1).
  • Lawyers will “fight” and keep you informed (0c0b021bc81e6416a4).
  • Useful information during consultation (118cc9dae89cec5f06).
What is most often praised in reviews?

The team's competence, speed, clear online system and communication - according to the author's messages on birdeye.com.

Section sources (3)

Company complaints and responses

The complaints below are copyright messages on specific platforms; We do not call the company a scammer and do not confirm the facts. The company's responses are not recorded in the sources.

On birdeye.com (page 155667440560382) there is a review about a year ago that the lawyer, in the opinion of the author, is more busy with self-presentation than with business, and that the firm deserves 1 star. The company's response is not available in the source.

On the same page - a review about 4 years ago about repeated violations of promised deadlines without explanation and delays in responses. There is no response from the company.

There is also a review from about 4 years ago about poor communication during the visa transfer, lack of updates and lack of response to a request for a copy of the petition. There is no response from the company.

On birdeye.com (page 921462080) - a review about 7 years ago with sharp criticism of the firm's labor lawyers. There is no response from the company.

On birdeye.com (page lewis-p-c-jackson-773340288) - reviews about a year ago criticizing a particular lawyer as disorganized and unprepared, as well as a review about 6 months ago alleging that the lawyer was selling counterfeit goods on social networks. These statements are unsubstantiated and refer to an individual and not the firm as a whole.

Experience.com - Review dated February 25, 2026, describing rude and condescending treatment. There is no response from the company.

On birdeye.com (page 1438888695015) - review about 5 years ago with the intention of giving a negative rating. There is no response from the company.

  • Complaint about self-presentation instead of work, ~1 year ago (7c83c400d9652b7bcc).
  • Complaint about missed deadlines and delayed responses, ~4 years ago (f5e76bd5f51fc996d7).
  • Complaint about poor communication during visa transfer, ~4 years ago (6406d3246065dce3b5).
  • Harsh criticism of labor lawyers, ~7 years ago (896efe8dc9599d83f1).
  • Criticism of a specific lawyer, ~1 year ago (133a3aa4737498cbaa, 8a5145e24b18833265).
  • Allegation of counterfeit, ~6 months ago (08ea8ec49d2c77fae2).
  • Complaint about rudeness, 02.25.2026 (86bfce99af960f9a9d).
  • Intention to give a negative review, ~5 years ago (ab75fea98eb53dcfac).
Does the company respond to complaints?

The company's responses to the listed complaints are not recorded in available sources.

Are the allegations about a specific lawyer substantiated?

No, these are copyright messages; we do not confirm them and do not transfer them to the company as a whole.

Section sources (5)

What clients say

The summaries below describe available accounts with attribution. A reviewer's statements are not established facts about the company.

Positive experience

Competence and speed

The author of the review describes the fast and efficient work, competent paralegals and lawyer, responsiveness over the phone and an easy-to-understand online system.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author notes the fast and efficient work, competent paralegals and lawyer, responsiveness over the phone and an understandable online system.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 7 years ago (exact date not established)

Professional business management

The reviewer reports professional handling of the case and a “smooth”, less stressful process.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports professional case management and a “smooth”, less stressful process.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 2 months ago (exact date not established)

Willingness to fight and inform

The reviewer notes that the lawyers “will fight” and keep the client informed.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author writes that lawyers will “fight” and keep the client informed.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 years ago (exact date not established)

Useful advice

The author of the review reports useful information received during the consultation.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author reports useful information received during the consultation.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 2 months ago (exact date not established)

What are they complaining about?

Communication and timing

Reviewers report broken promises on deadlines without explanation, delayed responses, and lack of updates on visa transfers.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

The author claims repeated violations of promised deadlines without explanation and delays in responses.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 years ago (exact date not established)

The author claims poor communication during the visa transfer, lack of updates and lack of response to request for a copy of the petition.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 4 years ago (exact date not established)

The quality of work of a particular lawyer

Review authors criticize a particular lawyer as unorganized and unprepared; These are the author's reports, not confirmed facts.

Examples in the available selection: 2
View evidence

The author claims that this particular lawyer is disorganized, unprepared and indifferent; does not recommend.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: a year ago (exact date not established)

The author states that he cannot recommend a specific lawyer and gives zero stars.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: a year ago (exact date not established)

Harsh criticism of labor practices

The author of the review sharply criticizes the firm's labor lawyers; This is the author's message, not an established fact.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author sharply criticizes the firm's labor lawyers, calling them dishonest and untrustworthy.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 7 years ago (exact date not established)

Rudeness and condescension

The author of the review dated 02/25/2026 describes rude and condescending treatment.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author describes rude and condescending treatment and calls the lawyers incompetent.

experience.com ↗Publication date: 2026-02-25

Self-presentation instead of business

The author of the review claims that the lawyer is more busy with self-presentation than with the case; This is the author's message.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author claims that the lawyer is more busy with self-presentation than with the case, and gives one star.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: a year ago (exact date not established)

General dissatisfaction

The author of the review intends to give a negative rating; This is the author's message.

Examples in the available selection: 1
View evidence

The author intends to give a negative rating and promises to update the review later.

birdeye.com ↗Date of publication: 5 years ago (exact date not established)

Sources and updates

Observation dates are indicated at the sites and in the profile materials.

Full methodology and limitations

Jackson Lewis P.C. reviews

Write a review

Share your experience working with the company

Your rating
Select from 1 to 5 stars
What to write in a review
  • At what stage did you work with the company: consultation, preparation or submission of documents?
  • How was your communication and work, what did you like or caused difficulties?
  • What result was obtained or at what stage is the matter now?

Describe your personal experience. Do not indicate document numbers and other people's personal data.

From 30 to 3000 characters

Review will appear after verification.

Explore other companies

Few reviews yet

Comparison available from 20 reviews. There is not enough data yet to confidently assess the company.

What does the number of ratings mean?

One person can leave reviews on several platforms. The number of ratings does not equal the number of unique customers.

A small sample provides less basis for generalizations. A large sample also does not guarantee the quality of the service or the outcome of the case.

More about the sample

Report an issue

Point out any inaccuracies in the text, estimates, or company data.