✦immigration-reviews.ru
Company profile

Harvey Law Group reviews

Harvey Law Group (HLG) is an international law firm with a self-described specialization in investment immigration and business law, with a network of offices and locally licensed lawyers. The sources studied confirmed the company’s official pages, a list of programs and offices, as well as a historical sample of reviews on a third-party site. There is no independent confirmation of licenses in state registers and no current aggregate rating.

Extraordinary ability and NIWBusiness and employmentCitizenship

Reviews of Harvey Law Group: how to read profile materials

The Harvey Law Group profile contains accessible materials on client experiences and site assessments. Read them along with dates, source type, and sampling boundaries. The number of observations does not mean the number of unique customers; the overall score and reviews from site visitors are shown separately.

Reviews and ratings · Sources · Methodology · JSON profile data

Platform ratings

The main rating is the average of available site cards, taking into account the number of ratings. Sources considered are marked below. Duplicate pages and known mirrors are counted once. The total number of ratings on sites is not equal to the number of unique clients. If complete cards are not available, a historical sample of individual scores is used.

Site and typePointsQuantityDate of observation
trustburn.comHistorical site cardIncluded in the rating4.2 / 5.011

Few reviews: the company has a total of less than 20 ratings. The sample size is not large enough to make a confident generalization, but does not in itself indicate the quality of the company.

Facts and data boundaries

Company overview

Direction
US Immigration Services
Service languages
English (main site), German, French, Chinese, Khmer, Turkish, Vietnamese
Data Status
Historical reviews; description verified October 9, 2026.
Viewing date: to be confirmed
Updating materials
By source dates

Declared service areas

  • EB-1A
  • E-2
  • EB-2
  • EB2-NIW
  • EB2 NIW STEM
  • EB2-NIW AME
  • EB2-NIW for airplane and helicopter pilots
  • EB-5
  • Trump Gold and Platinum Card
  • Investment immigration and citizenship by investment
  • Residency by investment
  • Citizenship by descent
  • Retirement visas
  • Corporate and business law
  • Private Client Services
  • Compliance and due diligence

A company's self-description does not constitute independent verification of qualifications or results. Check on the official website.

Specialization and suitable clients

Harvey Law Group describes itself on its website as an international law firm specializing in investment immigration and business law, with a global network of offices and locally qualified lawyers. The firm says it advises individuals and families on residency, citizenship and international mobility issues.

By its own description, HLG evaluates available programs, suggests suitable options to suit a client's needs, identifies potential problems before applying, and manages the legal process before obtaining residency or citizenship. This positioning is aimed at clients considering investment or business immigration routes, rather than generic family or work visas.

The available materials do not contain independent data on what proportion of the practice is specifically immigration cases in the United States, so conclusions about the depth of specialization in American categories should be made in consultation.

  • Declared specialization: investment immigration, citizenship by investment, business law.
  • Declared client categories: individuals, families, businesses, and work with governments (according to the firm).
  • The United States is only part of a broader international practice that spans dozens of jurisdictions.
Is the company suitable if I am only interested in immigration to the USA?

The USA website is presented in a separate block of programs (EB-1A, E-2, EB-2, EB2-NIW and options, EB-5). However, the firm positions itself as an international practice with a wide range of jurisdictions, so during the consultation it is worth clarifying which lawyers are handling American cases and what experience they have.

Section sources (2)

Confirmed services and locations

The official website lists American programs: EB-1A, E-2, EB-2, EB2-NIW, EB2 NIW STEM, EB2-NIW AME, EB2-NIW for airplane and helicopter pilots, as well as EB-5 and Trump Gold and Platinum Card. This is a statement by the firm of proposed areas of focus and is not an endorsement of results in specific cases.

The geography of the practice, according to the website, includes offices in the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, America, the Caribbean and Africa. Offices listed include Hong Kong (including Discovery Bay), Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh City, Hanoi, Da Nang, Phnom Penh, Yangon, Paris, Lisbon, London, Istanbul, Miami, Montreal, Vancouver, St. George's (Grenada), Roseau (Dominica), Johannesburg and Abidjan.

The firm claims 19 offices worldwide and more than 60 programs. These figures are the company's official statements as of the date the site was snapped (October 2026) and are not independently verified data.

  • American programs according to the site: EB-1A, E-2, EB-2, EB2-NIW (including STEM, AME and for pilots), EB-5.
  • 19 offices and 60+ programs are announced (official approval of the company).
  • Offices in the USA: Miami; in Canada: Montreal and Vancouver.
Does the company have an office in the USA?

The contact page lists a Miami office (1110 Brickell Avenue, Suite 609). This is the data from the official website; It is worth confirming the relevance of the address when applying.

Section sources (2)

Russian language

There is no evidence in the available materials that the company provides services in Russian. The official website contains a language switcher: English, German, French, Chinese, Khmer, Turkish and Vietnamese - Russian is not listed among them.

In the list of employees on the “About Us” page, Russian-language names or an indication of the Russian language are not reflected. This does not mean that Russian-language communication is impossible, but it is not confirmed in the sources provided.

  • Russian is not listed among the interface languages of the official website.
  • There are no sources in the available materials confirming Russian-language support.
Is it possible to communicate with the company in Russian?

The Russian language is not confirmed in the sources provided. It is recommended to directly check with the company whether there is a Russian-speaking lawyer or coordinator.

Section sources (2)

Working with the company

According to the website, the firm offers to request a consultation, after which the team evaluates the client's goals, family circumstances and investment preferences and explains suitable residency or citizenship options. The contact page states that a response to your request will be provided within two business days.

The firm states that each mandate is handled by attorneys admitted to the bar in the relevant jurisdictions. This is an official statement; The available materials do not contain independent verification of the registries.

The specific steps of the process, the composition of documents, the timing and order of interaction are not detailed in the studied sources. It is logical to clarify these questions during a consultation.

  • Declared channel: request for consultation via the website, response within two business days (according to the website).
  • Cases are stated to be handled by attorneys admitted in their jurisdictions (official approval).
  • Details of the process, timing and list of documents are not disclosed in the available materials.
How to start working with the company?

The website offers a form for requesting consultation or feedback. According to the contact page, a response is received within two business days. At your first consultation, clarify who will handle your case and how communication will be organized.

Section sources (2)

Fees and contract

The sources reviewed do not contain data on the cost of Harvey Law Group's services, fee structure, payment procedure, or contract terms. The official website contains consultation request forms, but does not publish price lists.

Investment thresholds indicated on the website (for example, minimum investment amounts for programs in different countries) refer to the requirements of the programs themselves, and not to the cost of the company's services. They should not be confused with fees.

Questions about cost, payment stages, termination conditions and responsibilities of the parties should be asked directly and recorded in the contract.

  • The cost of the company's services is not confirmed in the available materials.
  • The investment minimums of the programs on the website are the requirements of the programs, and not the company's fees.
  • The terms of the agreement were not disclosed in the sources.
How much do the company's services cost?

Prices are not indicated in the sources provided. The cost and structure of fees must be clarified with the company directly and fixed in the contract.

Section sources (2)

Platform reviews and limitations

The available materials include a historical sample of 11 reviews on trustburn.com, dating back approximately 2-3 years prior to collection (snapshot from October 2026). They are all positive in tone. This is a historical snapshot, not a current ranking, and fee coverage may not be complete.

A separate historical observation: trustburn.com displayed a rating of 4.2 out of 5 based on 11 reviews (reviewed October 7, 2026). This is a historical observation and not a current aggregate rating.

The sources studied also contain links to other sites (Trustpilot, Glassdoor, Indeed, Martindale, Lawyers.com, Birdeye, BBB, Avvo, Reviewsolicitors, ProvenExpert, etc.), but their contents are not disclosed in the materials provided. Employee reviews on Glassdoor and Indeed refer to employee experience, not customer service, and should not be confused with customer reviews.

The selected sample, with exceptions, does not constitute a comprehensive independent ranking.

  • Historical sample: 11 reviews on trustburn.com, all positive in tone (snapshot October 2026).
  • Historical Rating Observation: 4.2/5 from 11 reviews (trustburn.com, verified 10/07/2026).
  • The contents of other sites are not disclosed in the available materials; Employee reviews are not equal to customer reviews.
Is it possible to focus on a rating of 4.2/5?

This is a historical observation on one site with a small number of reviews, and not a current aggregate rating. It does not reflect the full picture and is not a substitute for self-checking.

Section sources (1)

Strengths mentioned in reviews

In a historical sample of reviews on trustburn.com, clients describe the team as knowledgeable and efficient, citing clear support and a personalized approach. Several authors mention long-term collaboration and responsiveness.

These reviews are proprietary communications on a third-party platform and are not established facts or official statements by the firm. They represent historical information only and have not been independently verified.

  • They note professionalism and knowledge of the matter (69c5f1bc10a7b3be5f, 2dcd440556afdee8c9).
  • Clear support for the process is noted (bf254b11592a6a8797, 91f6542a4a87cc752d).
  • A personalized approach is noted (2dcd440556afdee8c9).
  • They note responsiveness and long-term cooperation (18eb909b608a5b2ac2, f60e10386560a21f00).
What is most often praised in reviews?

In the historical sample on trustburn.com, professionalism, clear support and a personalized approach are most often mentioned. These are opinion pieces, not verified facts.

Section sources (1)

Specific complaints

In the provided sample of reviews on trustburn.com there are no specific complaints: all 11 reviews are positive in tone. This does not mean that there are no complaints in other sources - the contents of other sites in the sources studied are not disclosed.

Since the complaints were not recorded in the sources studied, it would be incorrect to provide specific complaints with dates and URLs. The company's responses to complaints are also not reflected in the sources studied.

  • There were no complaints recorded in trustburn.com's historical sample.
  • Other sites are not disclosed in the available materials, so it is impossible to conclude that there are no complaints.
Are there any complaints against the company?

There are no complaints in the provided sample of reviews, but this is only one site with a small sample. The absence of complaints in the studied sources does not prove their absence in other sources.

Section sources (1)

Frequently asked questions

How is the contract drawn up and what does it cover?

The terms of the agreement are not disclosed in the sources studied. It is recommended to request a draft contract and clarify the list of services, stages and responsibilities of the parties.

How is the confidentiality of documents ensured?

In the sources studied, the procedure for handling documents is not disclosed. Check with the company about how materials are transferred and who has access to them.

Who will personally handle my case?

The firm states that each mandate is handled by attorneys admitted in their jurisdictions. During your consultation, find out who will handle your case.

What deadlines and stages are provided for my case?

In the sources studied, the timing and stages are not detailed. It is recommended that you request a written description of the steps and time frames at your consultation.

What is the fee structure and termination conditions?

The fee structure and termination conditions are not disclosed in the sources studied. Clarify these points directly and document them in the contract.

Section sources (3)

What clients say

The summaries below describe available accounts with attribution. A reviewer's statements are not established facts about the company.

Positive experience

Professionalism and knowledge of the matter

In a historical sample of reviews on trustburn.com, clients describe the team as knowledgeable and professional.

Examples in the available selection: 3
View evidence

The author notes that the team was knowledgeable and efficient, provided clear explanations and ensured a smooth process.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 2 years ago (exact date not established)

The author is impressed by the firm's professionalism, attention to detail and personalized approach.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 2 years ago (exact date not established)

The author notes the professionalism and expertise of the team that guided him through the entire process.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 2 years ago (exact date not established)

Process support

Review authors note clear support and clear explanations throughout the process.

Examples in the available selection: 3
View evidence

The author notes the professionalism and expertise of the team that guided him through the entire process.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 2 years ago (exact date not established)

The author is pleased with the professionalism and support at every stage of the process.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

The author notes the exceptional professionalism and efficiency of the team in his case.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

Responsiveness and long-term cooperation

Some authors mention responsiveness and long-term interaction with the company.

Examples in the available selection: 3
View evidence

The author reports many years of cooperation, professionalism and responsiveness of the team.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

The author notes long-term cooperation, knowledge of the team and availability to resolve issues.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

The author reports many years of cooperation and a high level of service and customer care.

trustburn.com ↗Date of publication: 3 years ago (exact date not established)

What are they complaining about?

Verified complaint topics have not yet been published. This is not a statement about the absence of negative experiences.

Sources and updates

Observation dates are indicated at the sites and in the profile materials.

Full methodology and limitations

Harvey Law Group reviews

Write a review

Share your experience working with the company

Your rating
Select from 1 to 5 stars
What to write in a review
  • At what stage did you work with the company: consultation, preparation or submission of documents?
  • How was your communication and work, what did you like or caused difficulties?
  • What result was obtained or at what stage is the matter now?

Describe your personal experience. Do not indicate document numbers and other people's personal data.

From 30 to 3000 characters

Review will appear after verification.

Explore other companies

Few reviews yet

Comparison available from 20 reviews. There is not enough data yet to confidently assess the company.

What does the number of ratings mean?

One person can leave reviews on several platforms. The number of ratings does not equal the number of unique customers.

A small sample provides less basis for generalizations. A large sample also does not guarantee the quality of the service or the outcome of the case.

More about the sample

Report an issue

Point out any inaccuracies in the text, estimates, or company data.